SOLR-10054 of course, sorry. > On 1 Feb 2017, at 11:05, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was just going to start so it is not too late. I'm good with pushing > SOLR-10035, however I don't think SOLR-10034 is the correct number for the > other issue? > > Le mer. 1 févr. 2017 à 10:50, Andrzej Białecki > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a > écrit : > Hi Adrien, > > If it’s not too late, I’d like to include SOLR-10035 and SOLR-10034 too. > >> On 30 Jan 2017, at 19:14, Adrien Grand <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Thanks Steve, I had looked at whether there were existing infra issues but >> had not thought about looking at their mailing-list. I'll have a look >> tomorrow at whether the GPG import succeeded. >> >> Le lun. 30 janv. 2017 à 19:06, Steve Rowe <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : >> FYI yesterday morning on the users@infra mailing list, sebb posted with >> subject “committers keys job failed last night”: >> >> > As some of you may have noticed, the committers pgp keys job did not >> > retrieve any keys last night. >> > >> > I made a change to use gpg instead of curl for downloading keys. >> > Unfortunately it looks like the gpg version on home.apache.org >> > <http://home.apache.org/> is not >> > as up to date as the version I tested on, and one of the options did >> > not work. >> > >> > Hopefully the code is now fixed to work on the older version, but we >> > won't know until tomorrow as the job only runs once a day. >> >> -- >> Steve >> www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/> >> >> > On Jan 30, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Adrien Grand <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> > There is an issue with GPG keys that prevents me from building a first RC: >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427 >> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427>. I'll monitor that >> > issue and build a RC once it is resolved. >> > >> > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 16:01, Adrien Grand <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : >> > +1 to get the change in if it is safe. >> > >> > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 15:59, Shawn Heisey <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : >> > On 1/25/2017 4:40 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: >> > > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that >> > > includes these fixes. >> > >> > The immediate simple fix for SOLR-10035 is a one-liner. Even the larger >> > fix of including redundant information that preserves backward API >> > compatibility would be very safe. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Shawn >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]> >> > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >
