[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15729289#comment-15729289
]
Romain Rigaux commented on SOLR-7672:
-------------------------------------
e.g. if we take the book/review example of http://yonik.com/solr-nested-objects/
This would (field name, then hierarchy of values) let us query to introspect
and build the "schema" easily:
{code}
_type_:"type_s:book"
_type_:"type_s:book.review"
{code}
> introduce implicit _parent_:true
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-7672
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7672
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: query parsers, update
> Affects Versions: 5.2
> Reporter: Mikhail Khludnev
> Assignee: Mikhail Khludnev
> Fix For: 5.5, 6.0
>
>
> Solr provides block join support in non-invasive manner. It turns out, it
> gives a chance to shoot a leg. As it was advised by [~thetaphi] at SOLR-7606,
> let AddUpdateCommand add _parent_:true field to the document (not to
> children). Do it *always* no matter whether it has children or not.
> Also, introduce default values for for block join qparsers \{!parent
> *which=\_parent\_:true*} \{!child *of=\_parent\_:true*} (sometimes, I rather
> want to hide them from the user, because they are misunderstood quite often).
>
> Please share your concerns and vote.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
