[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15549250#comment-15549250
]
Alexandre Rafalovitch commented on SOLR-1906:
---------------------------------------------
What would the URP do (using the latest available geo fields)? We could create
an enhancement newdev JIRA for this.
On removing the GeoHashField, if we were to remove it, would we want to
deprecate it first? Do we need a new Jira for that?
> Posibility to store actual geohash values in the geohash field type
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1906
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1906
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.5
> Environment: NA
> Reporter: Stian Berger
> Priority: Trivial
> Labels: geohash, spatialsearch
>
> Tried to index some data, containing already encoded geohashes, into a
> geohash field type.
> To my surprise I could not make it work...
> A sneak peak at the source, revealed to me that this field type takes a
> lat/lng pair as it's value, not a geohash...
> Could this be fixed, so the field type also can take actual geohashes?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
