On 8/19/2016 11:23 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > To be very clear, my point was that by moving out of confluence and to an > asciidoc based system kept in git, we know have the *choice* to > maintain/backport documentation for multiple versions, and an easy way to > backport changes. > > This is not even a viable *option* for us to consider with confluence.
+1 to the move. I haven't got any idea how asciidoc works, but I trust the judgement of those who think it's a viable option. Having the documentation in version control opens up a lot of possibilities. Questions about how to manage the workflow can be decidedlater, in the implementation phase, when/if the immediate proposal is approved. I have one or two ideas to discuss. Thanks, Shawn --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
