Just like Michael: +1, we should remove the Lucene doc values based queries.
yeah, I've seen people do this too (search non-indexed DV fields). It performs fine on the techproducts data set... all 32 docs.... Just enough to encourage people think it's OK until they try to scale. Erick On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Michael McCandless <[email protected]> wrote: > You should use dimensional points for range searching now. > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I was looking at the type definitions in our examples and we have >> numerics with precisionStep=0 and those with precisionStep=8. But the >> documentation that explains why the later are useful >> (NumericRangeQuery) is now a (LegacyNumericRangeQuery) and the source >> code seems to show that docValues can (should?) be used instead. >> >> So, are the additional types with non-zero precisionStep still have >> their place? Or can we just use a single numeric type and add >> docValues if they will be used with range queries? >> >> Regards, >> Alex. >> >> ---- >> Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates: >> http://www.solr-start.com/ >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
