>
> And I'm still on the fence - _explain_ alone does not justify a whole
> new syntax IMO... so we may need more usecase examples to figure out
> what problem we're actually trying to solve.
>
The key use case I am thinking of is an easy way to add a value to the
the response. In SQL:
SELECT name,'hello' FROM ...
With this syntax you can now use:
fl=name,_value:hello_
The existing syntax is totally ridiculous:
fl=name,{!transformer name=value value=hello}
I see a real need to be able to pass a simple value to a transformer.
Explain is just one of many examples.
ryan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
