[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15177188#comment-15177188
]
Nicholas Knize commented on LUCENE-7056:
----------------------------------------
bq. we want to not have all of spatial3d/geo3d piled in one package, so lets
just start with that?
+1 This would be a wonderful improvement.
I'm also not a fan of the name *3d. It causes confusion that this package
handles altitude. Since its dependency free I still think it makes most sense
to refactor it to the spatial module under a geometry package and just have the
spatial and spatial-extras modules. Having a third just for a geometry model
doesn't make sense to me.
Of course, longer term, we should simplify the geom portion of the Geo API so
the users don't care what the underlying geometry model is. That should be
dictated by chosen datum/projection once we have support in place.
> Spatial3d/Geo3d should have zero runtime dependencies
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7056
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7056
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: modules/spatial3d
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Fix For: 6.0
>
>
> This is a proposal for the "spatial3d" module to be purely about the
> shape/geometry implementations it has. In Lucene 5 that's actually all it
> has. In Lucene 6 at the moment its ~76 files have 2 classes that I think
> should go elsewhere: Geo3DPoint and PointInGeo3DShapeQuery. Specifically
> lucene-spatial-extras (which doesn't quite exist yet so lucene-spatial) would
> be a suitable place due to the dependency. _Eventually_ I see this module
> migrating elsewhere be it on its own or a part of something else more
> spatial-ish. Even if that never comes to pass, non-Lucene users who want to
> use this module for it's geometry annoyingly have to exclude the Lucene
> dependencies that are there because this module also contains these two
> classes.
> In a comment I'll suggest some specifics.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
