Oh, I also changed this already. Looks like a conflict at OpenHUB :)
Anyways, both projects now have the official read-only git:// URL enlisted. For external usage (read-only) ASF prefers to use the git:// URL (also for Jenkins), because the protocol is much faster to clone, which is important for Jenkins and OpenHUB. Uwe ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen <http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [email protected] From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 4:47 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Updating whoweare page Thanks for this cleanup Jan. I'm not sure how useful the date of joining is. It's not a proxy for who is active, which is more useful but also hard to capture. Perhaps we could link to BlackDuck's "OpenHub" (formerly oholoh.net <http://oholoh.net> or something like that; it was a terrible name I always typo'ed) https://www.openhub.net/p/solr/contributors/summary https://www.openhub.net/p/lucene/contributors/summary Note: I went there and realized they weren't aware of our move to GitHub. I'm in the process of updating this info for Lucene and Solr on OpenHub. So depending on when you view this and how long it takes them, what you see could be incomplete. Cheers, ~ David On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:49 AM Shawn Heisey <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: On 1/29/2016 3:11 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote: > The page https://lucene.apache.org/whoweare.html used to be sorted on last > name. However somewhere along the way things got messed up and new committers > started adding themselves to the end of the list. > > I have re-sorted the list, and want your consent to publish the changes. > Please review the staging site http://lucene.staging.apache.org/whoweare.html > as well as the diff: > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/20080302/whoweare.patch and verify that I > have not messed up anything :-) There is one thing the current sort gives somebody who looks at the page -- an idea of who's new and who isn't. :) I have no strong objection to your proposal. If it had been sorted when I added my name, I would have put it in the middle of the list instead of the end and thought nothing of it. I do wonder if maybe there's a record of the date that each committer joined, and whether it would be appropriate to include that information? Thanks, Shawn --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> -- Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
