More to Mark's point, the focus of this effort is to move the repo and not the development model. Sure, we can debate a lot more on whether rebase or merge is preferred, bit given that the amount of git experience varies across committers, it would help to start off as close to SVN as possible, and linear history fits the bill.. On 20 Jan 2016 06:30, "Mark Miller" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:51 PM Noble Paul <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > Yes, patches in JIRA will still be the primary force, with our secondary >> > GitHub integration hooks. Agreed, 3rd party submissions will get >> effectively >> > squashed anyway. >> >> In the Git world users are happy give a pull request instead of a >> patch. Why do you think patches in Jira will be the primary force? >> >> > Because we are not changing anything about the current process right now. > Just moving from SVN to Git. > > First class support is still patches in JIRA. We have a second class > integration with Github as well. As before, contributors are free to use > either. Nothing changes in that regard. > > - Mark > -- > - Mark > about.me/markrmiller >
