I don't think we should open the floodgates. How is this issue critical? We need to get the index corruption fix out. +1 to release as is.
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Ramkumar R. Aiyengar <[email protected]> wrote: > I missed the initial RC, but if we are going to re-spin (and looks like > Yonik has a patch up now), I would like to back-port SOLR-8418. Should be > fairly benign, let me know if there are any concerns.. > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thanks Yonik, let's see what this bug boils down to and how quickly we can >> get it fixed. >> >> Le ven. 15 janv. 2016 à 17:15, Yonik Seeley <[email protected]> a écrit : >>> >>> We've discovered a very serious bug, currently unknown how deep it >>> runs, but may make sense to respin if we can get it ironed out quickly >>> enough: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8496 >>> >>> -Yonik >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.4.1 >>> > >>> > The artifacts can be downloaded from: >>> > >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.4.1-RC1-rev1724447/ >>> > >>> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >>> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py >>> > >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.4.1-RC1-rev1724447/ >>> > >>> > The smoke tester already passed for me both with the local and remote >>> > artifacts, so here is my +1. >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > > > > -- > Not sent from my iPhone or my Blackberry or anyone else's --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
