Are there any tentative (not firm commitments) time frames for 6.0? If there is it'll help me figure out the right thing to do here.
I'm about to incorporate SOLR-8263 and beast. If that all works out, I'm thinking of declaring victory here and closing both SOLR-8263 and SOLR-6273. There haven't been any Jenkins failures in a while, although these tests are only run nightly. But they used to fail very regularly. I need to decide whether or not to backport and knowing any plans for 6.0 would help. I've already backported SOLR-6273 locally to 5x, and I'll backport and test 8263 over the weekend so I have a clue about the effort involved. I'd like to get this into people's hands sooner rather than later, although Marks point about this being an "ideal" 6.0 feature is well taken. On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <[email protected]> wrote: > A sort of related thought. > > There will most likely be a 5.4.1 at least for the Admin UI once > people start seriously using it every day. Because: obscure browser > bugs, Windows, Mobile, etc. Especially if Solr 6 is on Java 8 (it is, > right?), we would need a stable version for Java 7 users. > > > ---- > Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter: > http://www.solr-start.com/ > > > On 10 November 2015 at 13:29, Erick Erickson <[email protected]> wrote: >> Mark: >> >> Well, whether to put it into 5.x at all is one of the >> not-intentionally-hidden agenda items for me. How far out is "not that >> far"? A few weeks? 6 months? If it's too far out then the motivation >> for 5x is to get it in people's hands in a timely manner. OTOH, if 6.0 >> is coming out in roughly the same time-frame as a possible 5.5 (and >> probably thus there wouldn't _be_ a 5.5) it changes the equation. >> >> Shalin: >> >> Right, SOLR-8263 is being worked on. I'm mostly trying to get a sense >> of whether or what the time frame for 5.4 (or 5.5 or 6.0) allows. >> >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Mark Miller <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I wonder what the rush to put CDCR into 5x is? >>> >>> Seems like an ideal feature for 6x. Especially given it's current hardening >>> level and that 6x is not that far out. >>> >>> - Mark >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:37 AM Shalin Shekhar Mangar >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Erick, >>>> >>>> I believe SOLR-8263 can cause data loss problems in CDCR so I don't >>>> think we should put CDCR in 5.4 unless that issue is fixed first. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Erick Erickson <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > What is the thinking on cutting 5.4? It looks like the CCR (SOLR-6273) >>>> > is about ready to rock-n-roll. It's a lot of code, and I don't want to >>>> > push it into 5x just before we cut the next release. So if 5.4 is >>>> > imminent I'd like to know for my planning. >>>> > >>>> > Thanks! >>>> > Erick >>>> > >>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> Shalin Shekhar Mangar. >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>> -- >>> - Mark >>> about.me/markrmiller >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
