[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14981223#comment-14981223
 ] 

Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-8215:
--------------------------------------------

I'm just wondering if this would mean that if a replica gets marked as down 
(due to bugs / by mistake), one wouldn't be able to issue core admin commands 
to bring it back up if this patch (and please correct me if I misunderstand 
this) short circuits the requests at the HttpSolrCall layer. One such command 
is under discussion / development in SOLR-7569 (last few comments). I'm not 
suggesting right away that we don't do this, but do you have any thoughts 
around it? Fyi, [[email protected]].

> SolrCloud can select a core not in active state for querying
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-8215
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8215
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Varun Thacker
>         Attachments: SOLR-8215.patch
>
>
> A query can be served by a core which is not in active state if the request 
> hits the node which hosts these non active cores.
> We explicitly check for only active cores to search against  in 
> {{CloudSolrClient#sendRequest}} Line 1043 on trunk.
> But we don't check this if someone uses the REST APIs 
> {{HttpSolrCall#getCoreByCollection}} should only pick cores which are active 
> on line 794 on trunk. 
> We however check it on line 882/883 in HttpSolrCall, when we try to find 
> cores on other nodes when it's not present locally.
> So let's fix {{HttpSolrCall#getCoreByCollection}} to make the active check as 
> well.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to