[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14941964#comment-14941964
 ] 

Gregory Chanan commented on SOLR-8054:
--------------------------------------

I started prototyping this out.  I think there are potentially multiple tasks 
here:

1) Config API / Schema API equivalents for ConfigSets
See SOLR-7570 for the genesis of this; in short, the collection-based Config 
API and Schema APIs should not modify the underlying ConfigSet.  It makes 
sense, then, to have GET-able Config API/Schema APIs that are specific to the 
ConfigSet because:
a) these may be different from the Collection-Config representation
b) you may not have a collection using the ConfigSet currently in a "template" 
world (SOLR-5955).
Having PUT/POST-able ConfigSet-specific APIs is an open question IMO.

2) "Raw" File based view
I'm thinking an http equivalent for "ZkCli -cmd DOWNCONFIG".  The motivation is 
a subset of the motivation for a ConfigSet API as a whole, namely:
m1) Doesn't require zookeeper access (which may not be available)
m2) Can use the same authentication/authorization mechanisms as the rest of Solr
m3) Doesn't require a collection to be instantiated (as today via the ShowFile 
API)
There is a limitation due to http as compared to the ZkCli equivalent, namely 
that you can't "download" multiple files in a single GET request, see 
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1041542/how-to-download-multiple-files-with-one-http-request.
  So we'd have to do one of the following:
o1) zip up the ConfigSet
o2) require the client to go file-by-file like the ShowFile API today
o3) invent/use our own format that has "file breaks" within a single response
I'm not sure the effort here is worth it, considering (I hope) the future is 
API-based like the Config/Schema API, not File-based.  But it does at least 
seem useful until we are in a world where the majority are using the APIs.  As 
for the options, I don't like o1).  I don't have a strong preference for o2) vs 
o3), although I think I'd lean slightly to o3) just to be able to reduce the 
number of http calls required to download a config.

Thoughts?

> Add a GET command to ConfigSets API
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-8054
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8054
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: SolrCloud
>            Reporter: Gregory Chanan
>            Assignee: Gregory Chanan
>
> It would be useful to have a command that allows you to view a ConfigSet via 
> the API rather than going to zookeeper directly.  Mainly for security 
> reasons, e.g.
> - solr may have different security requirements than the ZNodes e.g. only 
> solr can view znodes but any authenticated user can call ConfigSet API
> - it's nicer than pointing to the web UI and using the zookeeper viewer, 
> because of the same security concerns as above and that you don't have to 
> know the internal zookeeper paths.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to