[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14646068#comment-14646068
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-6699:
--------------------------------------------

bq. you ARE after all describing a second surface shape by your x-y-z ranges

That's exactly it.  Essentially the BKD tree needs a way to recursively chop up 
the earth surface into smaller and smaller curved-rectangle-like (I think?) 
shapes on the earth's surface, both at indexing time and at search time.

At search time, for a given cell, it needs to "relate" to the query shape to 
know if the query shape full contains the cell, does not overlap with the cell, 
or partially overlaps.

But I don't understand the "degenerate in X/Y" Area objects... it seems like 
GeoArea would be used for the lat/lon "approximation" (outer bounding box?) to 
a GeoShape?  Seems like it's better if we can do all functions using proper 
earth-surface shapes?  Sorry this is still all very new to me :)

> Integrate lat/lon BKD and spatial3d
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-6699
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6699
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>
> I'm opening this for discussion, because I'm not yet sure how to do
> this integration, because of my ignorance about spatial in general and
> spatial3d in particular :)
> Our BKD tree impl is very fast at doing lat/lon shape intersection
> (bbox, polygon, soon distance: LUCENE-6698) against previously indexed
> points.
> I think to integrate with spatial3d, we would first need to record
> lat/lon/z into doc values.  Somewhere I saw discussion about how we
> could stuff all 3 into a single long value with acceptable precision
> loss?  Or, we could use BinaryDocValues?  We need all 3 dims available
> to do the fast per-hit query time filtering.
> But, second: what do we index into the BKD tree?  Can we "just" index
> earth surface lat/lon, and then at query time is spatial3d able to
> give me an enclosing "surface lat/lon" bbox for a 3d shape?  Or
> ... must we index all 3 dimensions into the BKD tree (seems like this
> could be somewhat wasteful)?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to