[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14643828#comment-14643828
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-7829:
-------------------------------------------------------

Commit 1692987 from [email protected] in branch 'dev/branches/branch_5x'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1692987 ]

SOLR-7829: Fixed a bug in distributed pivot faceting that could result in a 
facet.missing=true count which was lower then the correct count if 
facet.sort=index and facet.pivot.mincount > 1 (merge r1692983)

> Pivot Facet Bug: facet.missing=true + facet.sort=index facet.pivot.mincount > 
> ? == incorrect "missing" count
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-7829
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7829
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>            Assignee: Hoss Man
>             Fix For: 5.3, Trunk
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-7829.patch
>
>
> Following up on SOLR-7804 lead to this error which i'm splitting off into 
> it's own issue.  the nuthsell is that if you combine facet.missing, 
> facet.pivot.mincount, and facet.sort=index you might get incorrect counts (or 
> no counts at all) for the missing value of a pivot.
> fairly easy to reproduce the most extreme aspect of the problem (not getting 
> a missing count back even though it's above the minumum)...
> {noformat}
> bin/solr -e cloud -noprompt
> bin/post -c gettingstarted example/exampledocs/*.xml
> http://localhost:8983/solr/gettingstarted/query?rows=0&q=*:*&facet=true&facet.pivot=inStock&facet.missing=true
> ...
>     "facet_pivot":{
>       "inStock":[{
>           "field":"inStock",
>           "value":true,
>           "count":17},
>         {
>           "field":"inStock",
>           "value":false,
>           "count":4},
>         {
>           "field":"inStock",
>           "value":null,
>           "count":11}]}}}
> http://localhost:8983/solr/gettingstarted/query?rows=0&q=*:*&facet=true&facet.pivot=inStock&facet.missing=true&facet.pivot.mincount=10
> ...
>     "facet_pivot":{
>       "inStock":[{
>           "field":"inStock",
>           "value":true,
>           "count":17},
>         {
>           "field":"inStock",
>           "value":null,
>           "count":11}]}}}
> http://localhost:8983/solr/gettingstarted/query?rows=0&q=*:*&facet=true&facet.pivot=inStock&facet.missing=true&facet.pivot.mincount=10&facet.sort=index
> ...
>     "facet_pivot":{
>       "inStock":[{
>           "field":"inStock",
>           "value":true,
>           "count":17}]}}}
> {noformat}
> ...note that in the last example, the 'null' count is gone (even though it's 
> above the minimum) just because we changed the facet.sort.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to