[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14640394#comment-14640394
 ] 

Michael Aleythe commented on LUCENE-6012:
-----------------------------------------

does this limitation mean that the main text-field from the index should not be 
used as the base field for the suggestion component?

> AnalyzingSuggester exception because of length restriction: 
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: len must be <= 32767; got 38751
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-6012
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6012
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.10.1
>            Reporter: Daniel Aschauer
>              Labels: length, short, suggest
>
> I want to use a suggester but every time i want to build the index I get an 
> exception.
> As the exception comes from AnalyzingSuggester all kind of suggesters that 
> are subclasses fail to build.
> By now I don't understand the code for the suggester well and thus was not 
> able to track the error further down.
> OfflineSorter$ByteSequencesWriter tries to write the length of the bytearray 
> which not exceed 32767 because it is a short.
> 6877 [http-bio-8080-exec-2] ERROR org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore  - 
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: len must be <= 32767; got 38751
>         at 
> org.apache.lucene.util.OfflineSorter$ByteSequencesWriter.write(OfflineSorter.java:479)
>         at 
> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.analyzing.AnalyzingSuggester.build(AnalyzingSuggester.java:496)
>         at org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.Lookup.build(Lookup.java:190)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to