On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: >> Losing the jars would have a cost: those old >> branches wouldn't "work" out of box if you wanted to run tests on > > Yeah, I'd rather not have them at all than have them filtered and > crippled. It'll be confusing. >
But my argument is that they are already crippled. So what is the purpose of keeping the jars? I'd like to have full consolidated history, as much as possible, connect-the-dots across whatever CVS/SVN/etc repos to the extent maximally permitted by law, as Doug hints at. Just nuke the jars. Propose this and I will use any versioning system you would like on top of it! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
