+1 on that. Low regression risk + high performance improvement = totally worth it!
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Timothy Potter <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Anshum! > > I have one more minor change to SOLR-6820 (which is already in the 5.2 > branch), but I was waiting on some feedback before increasing the > default number of version buckets for the Solr UpdateLog. That fix is > in and I would like to commit that change, risk of regression is near > nil and the benefit is faster indexing performance ;-) > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The 5.2 branch has been created - > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_5_2/ > > > > @Tim Potter: I know you want to get SOLR-7582 in and you'd mentioned to > me > > about it. feel free to commit that change to the branch. > > > > If there's anything else that someone feels must go in with this release, > > please take a judgement call while also considering the ramifications of > > such a commit (if any). > > > > *Bug fixes* that aren't huge or complex and/or fix a critical bug are > fine. > > > > Let's play nice with the release branch. :) > > > > I plan on creating the RC sometime on Monday/Tuesday. > > > > -- > > Anshum Gupta > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Anshum Gupta
