[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14283948#comment-14283948
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-7005:
------------------------------------
I really don't wan't to weigh down SimpleFacets any more than it is... so I
will go the route that interval faceting did and put the code in a separate
class and only put a modicum of hooks into FacetComponent and SimpleFacets. As
I write this, my working code in-progress is actually a separate
SearchComponent that follows FacetComponent; it extends SimpleFacets to use
some of its capability. But it seems that if I'm going to use the facet
namespace, I ought to hook in directly to FacetComponent; plus users need not
register a separate component. As always, I welcome input from other devs.
p.s. preliminary perf #'s are super promising. Real numbers will be
forthcoming later. I envision real-time time-series heatmap movies being
generated and displayed in the browser with thousands of cells of resolution
per-frame.
> facet.heatmap for spatial heatmap faceting on RPT
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-7005
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7005
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: spatial
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Fix For: 5.1
>
>
> This is a new feature that uses the new spatial Heatmap / 2D PrefixTree cell
> counter in Lucene spatial LUCENE-6191. This is a form of faceting, and
> as-such I think it should live in the "facet" parameter namespace. Here's
> what the parameters are:
> * facet=true
> * facet.heatmap=fieldname
> * facet.heatmap.bbox=\["-180 -90" TO "180 90"]
> * facet.heatmap.gridLevel=6
> * facet.heatmap.distErrPct=0.10
> Like other faceting features, the fieldName can have local-params to exclude
> filter queries or specify an output key.
> The bbox is optional; you get the whole world or you can specify a box or
> actually any shape that WKT supports (you get the bounding box of whatever
> you put).
> Ultimately, this feature needs to know the grid level, which together with
> the input shape will yield a certain number of cells. You can specify
> gridLevel exactly, or don't and instead provide distErrPct which is computed
> like it is for the RPT field type as seen in the schema. 0.10 yielded ~4k
> cells but it'll vary. There's also a facet.heatmap.maxCells safety net
> defaulting to 100k. Exceed this and you get an error.
> The output is (JSON):
> {noformat}
> {gridLevel=6,columns=64,rows=64,minX=-180.0,maxX=180.0,minY=-90.0,maxY=90.0,counts=[[0,
> 0, 2, 1, ....],[1, 1, 3, 2, ...],...]}
> {noformat}
> counts is null if all would be 0. Perhaps individual row arrays should
> likewise be null... I welcome feedback.
> I'm toying with an output format option in which you can specify a base-64'ed
> grayscale PNG.
> Obviously this should support sharded / distributed environments.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
