sounds good, I’m +1 - 5.0 is a big deal and it’ll be good to get the
“5.0-FINAL” as solid as possible. Having an alpha release would surely get a
larger number of folks trying it out.
Erik
> On Jan 6, 2015, at 2:48 PM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'd like to suggest that we call the next release 5.0 alpha and follow it
> with either 5.0 or 5.0 beta (if need be) on the lines of the 4x releases.
>
> As for the history behind calling it that, here's a post about the 4.0 alpha
> release that should clarify things I'm thinking about.
>
> http://lucidworks.com/blog/4-0-alpha-whats-in-a-name/
> <http://lucidworks.com/blog/4-0-alpha-whats-in-a-name/>
>
> Again, this would be a stable, production release. Like all other public
> releases but would give us the freedom to change APIs that need to be changed.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
> http://about.me/anshumgupta <http://about.me/anshumgupta>
