OK the VOTE can now proceed; let's not hold 4.10.3 for this issue... sorry for the hassle Mark.
Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Michael McCandless <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry Mark, and thanks :) > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Mark Miller <[email protected]> wrote: >> Heh, I should have read my email before sending out the rc1 vote email. >> Practice email I guess. >> >> Let me know when you are ready for a re-roll. >> >> - Mark >> >> On Wed Dec 10 2014 at 6:09:42 AM Michael McCandless >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Mark, >>> >>> If it's not too late, I'd like to get LUCENE-6105 in for 4.10.3, if >>> possible. I think it's a low risk change, and for apps that create >>> way too many FSTs, it can be a big HEAP reduction. >>> >>> Mike McCandless >>> >>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Mark Miller <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > Due to some bad timing with the svn outages last week and other >>> > unrelated >>> > events, I've been a bit delayed on the 4.10.3 release, but I'm finally >>> > ready >>> > to cut an rc. I spent today working out the kinks (doh, used greater >>> > than >>> > ant 1.8x, doh, compiled with java 8, etc) I'll send out the email for >>> > rc1 >>> > tomorrow. >>> > >>> > - Mark >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
