[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14236963#comment-14236963
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2878:
--------------------------------------
bq. Its more than that, indexwriter has to reject such positions and tests
updated,
That part seems easy.
bq. old postings formats need to have a check and do something, etc.
That part could be more of a pain... not sure. But maybe not necessary if it's
never happened? (see below)
bq. Because some people like large position increment gap values between field
instances, someone can easily blow up positions to large values without
actually having that many terms.
Solr has defaulted to 100 forever... and even if a user changed to a *huge*
value, it would be super unlikely to hit MAX_INT exactly (esp since they would
get an exception if they went over... they are already in super dangerous
territory).
I think the only people that would have MAX_INT position are those that are
using positions to encode something other than real positions (i.e. using
positions like payloads) and have values going all the way up to MAX_INT, or
are using MAX_INT as a special value. It could very well be that no such user
exists.
> Allow Scorer to expose positions and payloads aka. nuke spans
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2878
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2878
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/search
> Affects Versions: Positions Branch
> Reporter: Simon Willnauer
> Assignee: Robert Muir
> Labels: gsoc2014
> Fix For: Positions Branch
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2878-OR.patch, LUCENE-2878-vs-trunk.patch,
> LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch,
> LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch,
> LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch,
> LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch,
> LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch,
> LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch,
> LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch, LUCENE-2878.patch,
> LUCENE-2878_trunk.patch, LUCENE-2878_trunk.patch, PosHighlighter.patch,
> PosHighlighter.patch
>
>
> Currently we have two somewhat separate types of queries, the one which can
> make use of positions (mainly spans) and payloads (spans). Yet Span*Query
> doesn't really do scoring comparable to what other queries do and at the end
> of the day they are duplicating lot of code all over lucene. Span*Queries are
> also limited to other Span*Query instances such that you can not use a
> TermQuery or a BooleanQuery with SpanNear or anthing like that.
> Beside of the Span*Query limitation other queries lacking a quiet interesting
> feature since they can not score based on term proximity since scores doesn't
> expose any positional information. All those problems bugged me for a while
> now so I stared working on that using the bulkpostings API. I would have done
> that first cut on trunk but TermScorer is working on BlockReader that do not
> expose positions while the one in this branch does. I started adding a new
> Positions class which users can pull from a scorer, to prevent unnecessary
> positions enums I added ScorerContext#needsPositions and eventually
> Scorere#needsPayloads to create the corresponding enum on demand. Yet,
> currently only TermQuery / TermScorer implements this API and other simply
> return null instead.
> To show that the API really works and our BulkPostings work fine too with
> positions I cut over TermSpanQuery to use a TermScorer under the hood and
> nuked TermSpans entirely. A nice sideeffect of this was that the Position
> BulkReading implementation got some exercise which now :) work all with
> positions while Payloads for bulkreading are kind of experimental in the
> patch and those only work with Standard codec.
> So all spans now work on top of TermScorer ( I truly hate spans since today )
> including the ones that need Payloads (StandardCodec ONLY)!! I didn't bother
> to implement the other codecs yet since I want to get feedback on the API and
> on this first cut before I go one with it. I will upload the corresponding
> patch in a minute.
> I also had to cut over SpanQuery.getSpans(IR) to
> SpanQuery.getSpans(AtomicReaderContext) which I should probably do on trunk
> first but after that pain today I need a break first :).
> The patch passes all core tests
> (org.apache.lucene.search.highlight.HighlighterTest still fails but I didn't
> look into the MemoryIndex BulkPostings API yet)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
