Hmmm, this looks odd, indeed. Perhaps it was an incomplete attempt to fix up the fact that after you UNLOAD a core, it's not obvious that CREATE (or maybe RELOAD?) would get the core back.
But it doesn't seem to do anything so even if someone uses it, nothing happens which is A Bad Thing. Removing it would cause anyone using it now to have an error they didn't have before, but I'm hard-pressed to believe that that's really worse than failing silently as it does at present. Counter-prorposal: Leave it in and have it call CREATE with minimal parameters and add LOAD to the docs. That said, I'm not able to do the actual work right now so whatever you decide. Erick On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Varun Thacker <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there a reason why we have a switch condition to LOAD in code? Can we > remove otherwise. > > -- > > > Regards, > Varun Thacker > http://www.vthacker.in/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
