[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14224015#comment-14224015
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-6781:
-------------------------------------------------------

Commit 1641524 from [~dsmiley] in branch 'dev/branches/lucene_solr_4_10'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1641524 ]

SOLR-6781: Bugfix- BBoxField didn't support dynamic fields.

> BBoxField doesn't support dynamic fields
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-6781
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6781
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: spatial
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Assignee: David Smiley
>         Attachments: SOLR-6781__Fix_BBoxField_dynamic_field_support.patch
>
>
> The BBoxStrategy in Lucene spatial requires a Lucene FieldType to use for its 
> 4 numeric fields (e.g. configure doc-values, precisionStep, stored, indexed). 
> Solr's FieldType doesn't directly expose a Lucene FieldType, unfortunately, 
> so instead the Solr BBoxField as a hack creates a dummy value of one of the 
> sub-fields corresponding to the suffix. But the sub-field names will also 
> match the dynamic field pattern, assuming the dynamicField ends with a '*'.  
> Furthermore, the sub-fields don't actually get registered with the schema 
> properly in the dynamic field case.
> The end result is that while attempting to get a dummy field value to get the 
> Lucene FieldType, it inadvertently returns the spatial strategy field itself 
> (not the numeric one) and calls createField which results in an 
> IllegalStateException with an error that is pretty confounding.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to