we found it upgrading ES and ryan and myself did ask ourself the same question why is there no test in Lucene that catches this :/
simon On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: > Why was this not detected by a test? > > > > Uwe > > > > ----- > > Uwe Schindler > > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > > http://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: [email protected] > > > > From: Ryan Ernst [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 9:57 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] 4.10.0 RC0 > > > > Unfortunately I just found Lucene43NGramTokenizer was broken by my Version > cleanup from analysis constructors. It must be final. I'll fix this and add > a test in the morning. Hopefully will have a new RC by tomorrow evening. > > On Friday, August 22, 2014, Ryan Ernst <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please vote for the first release candidate for Lucene/Solr 4.10.0. > > The artifacts can be downloaded here: > http://people.apache.org/~rjernst/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.10.0-RC0-rev1619858 > > Or you can run the smoker tester directly with this command line > (assuming you have JAVA7_HOME set): > python3.2 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py > http://people.apache.org/~rjernst/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.10.0-RC0-rev1619858 > 1619858 4.10.0 /tmp/smoke_test_4_10 > > Please note, the RC number is starting at 0 because I used the sample > command line in buildAndPushRelease.py. If there is another release, > I will jump to RC2 to avoid confusion (thus it would be the "second" > RC). I also plan to open an issue to clean up some things about > buildAndPushRelease.py help (or lack there of). > >> SUCCESS! [0:35:20.208893] > Here is my +1 > > Thanks, > Ryan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
