[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14074391#comment-14074391
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-6216:
------------------------------------
[~tomasflobbe] , do you have any scripts for your performance testing? I am
impressed with that part specifically as I've got some interval faceting on my
horizon to do what is somewhat similar to what you've got here LUCENE-5735
> Better faceting for multiple intervals on DV fields
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6216
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6216
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
> Assignee: Erick Erickson
> Fix For: 4.10
>
> Attachments: SOLR-6216.patch, SOLR-6216.patch, SOLR-6216.patch,
> SOLR-6216.patch, SOLR-6216.patch, SOLR-6216.patch, SOLR-6216.patch,
> SOLR-6216.patch, SOLR-6216.patch, SOLR-6216.patch
>
>
> There are two ways to have faceting on values ranges in Solr right now:
> “Range Faceting” and “Query Faceting” (doing range queries). They both end up
> doing something similar:
> {code:java}
> searcher.numDocs(rangeQ , docs)
> {code}
> The good thing about this implementation is that it can benefit from caching.
> The bad thing is that it may be slow with cold caches, and that there will be
> a query for each of the ranges.
> A different implementation would be one that works similar to regular field
> faceting, using doc values and validating ranges for each value of the
> matching documents. This implementation would sometimes be faster than Range
> Faceting / Query Faceting, specially on cases where caches are not very
> effective, like on a high update rate, or where ranges change frequently.
> Functionally, the result should be exactly the same as the one obtained by
> doing a facet query for every interval
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
