[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14055851#comment-14055851
]
Ryan Ernst commented on LUCENE-5806:
------------------------------------
bq. Edit: Ah, because it's a fragment this is all moot.
Yup, I did try something like this, but couldn't get it working. I think it
may be possible, but what I have here works, and I don't think is too bad.
[~thetaphi] [~jdconradson] I think this is ready. Do you have any more
concerns?
> Extend expression grammar to allow advanced "variables"
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5806
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5806
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ryan Ernst
> Attachments: LUCENE-5806.patch, LUCENE-5806.patch
>
>
> We currently allow dots in "variable" names in expressions, so that we can
> fake out object access. We should extend this to allow array access as well
> (both integer and string keys). This would allow faking out full object
> nesting through bindings.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
