[email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley [[email protected]] wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Toke Eskildsen <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I do not understand the logic here: When my request is for mincount > 0, >> when does it ever make sense to have terms with count=0 returned from >> any shard?
> So you know you've seen that term and don't have to request more info > for it in the next faceting phase. That would work when the returned zero-terms matches well with non-zero terms from other shards. I can follow the idea, but it seems like a rather narrow case and there is no sanity checking on cardinality. > It probably helps with low cardinality fields, but would hurt with > high cardinality fields with low doc counts in the request. Medium-cardinality seems problemativ too. With a cardinality of just 10.000 values and a result set size of 100, there seems to be little chance of any zero-terms from one shard matching any non-zero ones from another. - Toke Eskildsen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
