I'd love to make this stuff easier (SOLR-5507). Stalled on how to make
a transition work. Just starting a new codebase using Angular would be
great, but could easily become a stalled effort, and easily make things
worse than they are now (two code bases to understand, rather than
one).



If anyone has ideas about how to get Angular and Sammy to co-exist for
a while, I'm all ears.



Upayavira





On Sat, Mar 1, 2014, at 06:26 PM, Stefan Matheis wrote:

i think the rest was long enough (: sometimes i need an additional kick
in the butt .. erm i mean, motivation! =]



will give it another try in the upcoming & next week. at least get a
initial collection handling done, we can still think about additional
steps how to handle things differently while on Cloud-Mode or not.



Although i wouldn't say no to another pair of eyes ;> Upayavira brought
up the idea to refactor the UI using AngularJS (SOLR-5507), which could
lower the entry barrier quite a bit for others .. but i haven't had
much time to work on this either in the past few months.



-Stefan



  On Saturday, March 1, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:

At least three JIRAS relate:
SOLR-4316, SOLR-4388, SOLR-5466

It seems to me, that if SOLR-5466 got done (don't see why it'd be hard)
we'd have enough to make this work, particularly adding/deleting
collections _and_ adding cores on specific nodes to specific shards.

In fact, we don't even need SOLR-5466, we have the cluster state from
ZK. Although using the Collections api would insulate it from any
changes to cluster state and would be easier to work with.

Unfortunately I completely lack the UI skills necessary to work on
this, but I'd be happy to collaborate on the rest of it.

Anyone want to volunteer for the UI part? Should I cross-post on the
user's list? I mean Stefan has done yeoman's duty here, maybe he'd like
a rest :).

I think this is a significant barrier to using SolrCloud, at least
getting started. Most or all of the infrastructure is in place, it
seems that this is mostly wrapping it in a UI.

Thoughts?

Reply via email to