I just reviewed the code thinking of how to make it easier to reproduce issues, we should give this test class a startingGun.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: > I could share it right here, but in any case I just found _another_ > stupid mistake where I was doing something in which multiple analyzers > would end up sharing something unsharable. > > > build 21-Mar-2014 10:36:59 > testRandomStressWithBasisTokenizer(com.basistech.rosette.lucene.BaseLinguisticsTokenFilterTest) > Time elapsed: 9.249 sec <<< FAILURE! > build 21-Mar-2014 10:36:59 org.junit.ComparisonFailure: term 5 > expected:<[kiiiintii?j?rjesstelm?]> but was:<[ssiikojenen]> > build 21-Mar-2014 10:36:59 at > __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([A574C0CEE3A9C8A3:47C87E8DE3A08C35]:0) > build 21-Mar-2014 10:36:59 at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:115) > build 21-Mar-2014 10:36:59 at > org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.assertTokenStreamContents(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:169) > build 21-Mar-2014 10:36:59 at > org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkAnalysisConsistency(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:747) > build 21-Mar-2014 10:36:59 at > org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:546) > build 21-Mar-2014 10:36:59 at > org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:447) > build 21-Mar-2014 10:36:59 at > org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:375) > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Dawid Weiss > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I just fixed a thread-safety bug, but I just saw another failure, and >>> I'm pulling my hair because it refuses to repro. >> >> You can run with a single JVM by passing -Dtests.jvms=1 (or so I >> believe; try ant test-help). This shouldn't affect multi-threaded >> tests but if you have a problem with dependency between suites (test >> classes), such as some values from preinitialized static fields or the >> like then it may be the cause. >> >> Otherwise the test framework makes it really simple: if a thread was >> created within a test class then it should die before the test class >> completes. What is the exception (stack?) you're getting? Can you >> share it privately? >> >> Dawid >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
