Solr/Lucene 4.8 -> Java 7 +1 I'm not too sure about moving trunk to java 8 . Let's keep it at java 7 and make a call when we are closer to Lecene-Solr 5.0. Organizations move to newer versions of java very slowly.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > > the vote must be held open for 72 hours. I haven't even had a chance to > > formulate my VOTE+reasoning yet, and i dont agree with this crap here. > > Indeed, there is no need to hurry! I just wanted more discussions coming > in. > The merges I prepared already are stable and pass all tests, smokers,... > So no problem to wait 2 more days, it is not urgent to commit my branch_4x > checkout. > > As said in the thread already, I expected the reaction from our > company-users/company-committers. I disagree, too, but it looks like more > people are against this and that won't change anymore. > I agree with you: "trunk" is our development branch, I see no problem with > making it Java 8 only. From the other issue, we have no important news to > actually release this as 5.0 soon, so we can for sure play with it for long > time. To me it looks like some of our committers have forks off trunk they > want to sell to their customers. > > Uwe > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: [email protected] > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Robert Muir [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 1:34 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Java 7 in Lucene/Solr 4.8, use Java 8 in > trunk > > (once officially released) > > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > it looks like we all agree on the same: > > > > > > +1 for Lucene 4.x requirement on Java 7. > > > -1 to not change trunk (keep it on Java 7,too). > > > > > > I will keep this vote open until this evening, but I don't expect any > other > > change. Indeed, there are no real technical reasons to not move. > > > > the vote must be held open for 72 hours. I haven't even had a chance to > > formulate my VOTE+reasoning yet, and i dont agree with this crap here. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional > > commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- ----------------------------------------------------- Noble Paul
