[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12917372#action_12917372
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2662:
-----------------------------------------
bq. Simon, I'm going to get deletes working, tests passing using maps in the RT
branch, then we can integrate. This'll probably be best.
Jason, I suggest you create a separate issue something like "Integrate
BytesRefHash in Realtime Branch" and I will take care of it. I think this issue
had a clear target to factor out the hash table out of TermsHashPerField and we
should close it. lets use a new one to track the integration.
Thoughts?
Simon
> BytesHash
> ---------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2662
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2662
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Index
> Affects Versions: Realtime Branch, 4.0
> Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
> Assignee: Simon Willnauer
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Realtime Branch, 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2662.patch, LUCENE-2662.patch, LUCENE-2662.patch,
> LUCENE-2662.patch, LUCENE-2662.patch, LUCENE-2662.patch
>
>
> This issue will have the BytesHash separated out from LUCENE-2186
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
