[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12914493#action_12914493
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2665:
---------------------------------------
bq. really just want the Bits before another year goes by!
+1
bq. Eviction policies, etc, are out of scope here IMO.
oh, I sure hope so!
I'm reading Mikes list as stuff we should keep in mind as we start a new
direction. The basic design should not preclude these enhancements, but i sure
hope they are not required before laying the basic groundwork (especially if
this only goes to /trunk for now)
> Rework FieldCache to be more flexible/general
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2665
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2665
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Ryan McKinley
> Attachments: LUCENE-2665-FieldCacheOverhaul.patch
>
>
> The existing FieldCache implementation is very rigid and does not allow much
> flexibility. In trying to implement simple features, it points to much
> larger structural problems.
> This patch aims to take a fresh approach to how we work with the FieldCache.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
