From a users perspective, I would say that each one of FieldCollapse, AutoSuggest and SpatialSearch would justify a minor release (once stable).
-- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com On 22. sep. 2010, at 03.05, Robert Muir wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Chris Hostetter <[email protected]> > wrote: > For example: we probably shouldn't bother having a release if the only > thing commited to that branch since the previous release are to fix some > typoes in javadocs, or because new tests were added -- those changes are > good, and worth having, but too much proliferation of minor versions for > things that don't impact the users can be distracting and confusion, and > makes it hard to recognize when a release is worth upgrading too (it's a > girl who cried wolf thing). > > i completely agree with you. I didn't mean to give the impression by "every > month or two" that we should actually have anything remotely resembling a > schedule driven by arbitrary dates. I meant here to suggest a very rough idea > of the sort of frequency that I think might actually work, and to bring up > the point that what we might consider minor features can be viewed by users > as major. > > -- > Robert Muir > [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
