On Sep 13, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote: > With the proper two-way open-source development process (taking and then > giving) I think it can become an important part of open-IR technologies, just > like what Lucene did to the search engines world. What ORP has to offer is of > great interest to HebMorph, an open-source project of mine trying to decide > on what is the best way to index and search Hebrew texts. > > To this end I decided to put some of the development efforts of the HebMorph > project into making tools for the ORP. I have announced this before, but > unfortunately I had to attend to more pressing tasks before I could complete > this (and there was no response from the community anyway...). Just in case > you're interested in seeing what I came up with so far: > http://github.com/synhershko/Orev.
If you can, putting them up as a patch would be useful. That way, we can show some progress. > > IMHO, the ORP should stand by itself, and relate to Lucene/Solr only as its > basis framework for these initial stages. Perhaps also try to attract more > people who could find an interest in what it has to offer, so it can really > start growing. > > Itamar. > > On 12/9/2010 1:29 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> On Sep 11, 2010, at 8:51 PM, Robert Muir wrote: >> >> >>> i propose we take what we have and import into lucene-java's benchmark >>> contrib. it already has integration with wikipedia and reuters for perf >>> purposes, and the quality package is actually there anyways. later, maybe >>> more people have time and contrib/benchmark evolves naturally... e.g. to >>> modules/benchmark with solr support as a first big step. >>> >> Yeah, that seems reasonable. I have been thinking lately that it might be >> useful to pull our DocMaker stuff out separately from benchmark so that >> people have easy ways of generating content from things like Wikipedia, etc. >> >> Still, at the end of the day, I like what ORP _could_ bring to the table and >> to some extent I think that is lost by folding it into Lucene benchmark. >> >> >>> On Sep 11, 2010 7:33 PM, "Grant Ingersoll"<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Seems ORP isn't really catching on with people. I know personally I don't >>>> >>> have the time I had hoped to have to get it going. At the same time, I >>> really think it could be a good project. We've got some tools put together, >>> but we still haven't done much about the bigger goal of a "self contained" >>> evaluation. >>> >>>> Any thoughts on how we should proceed with ORP? >>>> >>>> -Grant >>>> >> >> >> -------------------------- Grant Ingersoll http://lucenerevolution.org Apache Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
