[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12909214#action_12909214
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2504:
-------------------------------------
{quote}
Java (Oracle) really needs to do something to address this.
{quote}
I think we all owe it to ourselves to stop equating java with Sun/Oracle, if
Java
stays with Oracle its pretty obvious the language (is) will die anyway.
{quote}
I think this is a severe and growing problem for Lucene going forward
- our search performance is crucial and we can't risk hotspot
randomly, substantially slowing things down by alot.
{quote}
While I agree at the moment we should make efforts to work around issues like
this,
I don't think we should jump the gun and make real design/architectural
choices based on Oracle bugs.
Especially for trunk, by the time we release Lucene 4.0 some other company
will probably "own" Java anyway.
{quote}
Not that we have a choice here... but I've often wondered whether .NET
has this same hotspot fickleness problem
{quote}
.NET is not a choice but generating C/C++ code is?
> sorting performance regression
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2504
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2504
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Reporter: Yonik Seeley
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2504.patch, LUCENE-2504.patch, LUCENE-2504.zip
>
>
> sorting can be much slower on trunk than branch_3x
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
