On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Simon Willnauer <[email protected]> wrote: >> Worst case scenerio: if it starts out as a SOLR issue and then the scope >> gets bigger, creating a new LUCENE issue to track it (and linking the two) >> seems trivial to me. > > Thanks hoss for expressing what i tried to do :) That all makes perfect sense!
This should not be mandated of course - it can still often make sense for a single issue to cover changes to lucene and solr (and lucene/solr modules). -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
