On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Lance Norskog <[email protected]> wrote: > I have discovered something: if you declare a PointType the subfields > exist and are addressable. If you fill in the subfields directly they > appear in search results, but the parent Point does not. I did this > because my input data has lat/long as separate fields. I have not > tested spatial queries, filtering, etc. > > Is this an accepted (or anticipated) use case? Is it worth supporting > that we can fill in the parts of a compound type?
I would generally discourage doing this since it makes assumptions about the underlying point type implementation and wouldn't work as you think for geohash or spatial tile fields. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
