[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12895624#action_12895624
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2514:
--------------------------------------------
bq. by the way, i was thinking it would be nice to really move this slow
collatedtermrangequery stuff either out of lucene alltogether or at least into
contrib/queries.
+1
I agree we have it backwards now. The "obvious" approach should be the
performant one.
> Change Term to use bytes
> ------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2514
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2514
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Search
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Attachments: LUCENE-2514-MTQPagedBytes.patch,
> LUCENE-2514-MTQPagedBytes.patch, LUCENE-2514-MTQPagedBytes.patch,
> LUCENE-2514-surrogates-dance.patch, LUCENE-2514.patch, LUCENE-2514.patch,
> LUCENE-2514.patch, LUCENE-2514.patch, LUCENE-2514.patch, LUCENE-2514.patch,
> LUCENE-2514.patch, LUCENE-2514.patch, LUCENE-2514.patch, LUCENE-2514.patch,
> LUCENE-2514.patch, LUCENE-2514.patch, LUCENE-2514.patch, LUCENE-2514.patch,
> LUCENE-2514_collatedrange.patch, LUCENE-2514_qp.patch
>
>
> in LUCENE-2426, the sort order was changed to codepoint order.
> unfortunately, Term is still using string internally, and more importantly
> its compareTo() uses the wrong order [utf-16].
> So MultiTermQuery, etc (especially its priority queues) are currently wrong.
> By changing Term to use bytes, we can also support terms encoded as bytes
> such as numerics, instead of using
> strange string encodings.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
