Tried to run it w/ SUN JRE6 and it succeeds ! I've tried several times and it succeeds every time. However, when I revert back to IBM's, it fail immediately.
I can help w/ the debug, if you give me a hint where to look :). Shai On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Shai Erera <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry for the delayed response. > > I ran it a couple more times, from Eclipse and Ant, and each time it fails > (amazing !), w/ different seeds. More seeds that fail: > NOTE: random seed of testcase 'testRandomRegexes' was: -4244174191361080127 > NOTE: random seed of testcase 'testRandomRegexes' was: -7059086272401721644 > NOTE: random seed of testcase 'testRandomRegexes' was: -1314734215611104147 > > I use IBM JVM, tried w/ both 1.5 and 1.6 ... > > Mike, can we use LUCENE-2565 to track this, or would you prefer that I open > a separate one? > > Shai > > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Michael McCandless < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On a more general note... >> >> Any time any of you out there hit an "odd" test failure, please please >> please do just what Shai did: take it to the dev list! >> >> Think of Lucene's unit tests like SETI :) We are desperately seeking >> bugs, and you and your machine may just be lucky enough to find one... >> go forth and buy expensive new power hungry computers just so you can >> run the random tests over and over, seeking the bugs! >> >> But be sure to include that random seed when you do hit a failure... >> >> Mike >> >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I agree, Shai can you open a bug? I cannot reproduce, did you use an IBM >> JVM >> > or another environment that might help us figure it out? >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Michael McCandless >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hmmm this means a bug is lurking. This is the power of random testing >> >> (that every time we all run tests, we're testing different "paths" >> >> through the code).... >> >> >> >> It seems exceptionally unlikely that LUCENE-2537's changes would cause >> >> this! >> >> >> >> But, unfortunately, when I plug that seed in I don't see it fail, >> >> which is odd. I'll run a stress test to see if I can tickle the >> >> bug... can you open a Jira issue so we don't lose track? >> >> >> >> Mike >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Shai Erera <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hi >> >> > >> >> > I was running tests on trunk (after merging the changes from >> >> > LUCENE-2537) >> >> > and received this error message: >> >> > >> >> > expected:<true> but was:<false> >> >> > >> >> > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected: but was: >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> > >> org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestUTF32ToUTF8.assertAutomaton(TestUTF32ToUTF8.java:197) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> > >> org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestUTF32ToUTF8.testRandomRegexes(TestUTF32ToUTF8.java:170) >> >> > at >> >> > >> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.runBare(LuceneTestCase.java:285) >> >> > >> >> > NOTE: random seed of testcase 'testRandomRegexes' was: >> >> > 3510820306304573866 >> >> > >> >> > I'm sure it's related to my changes. Has anyone else seen this >> before? >> >> > >> >> > Shai >> >> > >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Robert Muir >> > [email protected] >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >
