[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12891384#action_12891384
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1999:
--------------------------------
bq. It is not appropriate to mention non-released code on the official page for
releases.
why?
i can (moderately) understand that we should not "encourage" non-devleopers to
use unofficial versions, and i recognize that linking directly to nightlys from
the "official" release page is a very bad idea .. but how far down the rabbit
hole do we have to go to avoid links to links to links to links for nightly
builds?
Even following the letter of the policy you linked to, i don't see how we
anyone could possibly construe that we are "encourage(ing) non-developers to
download and use nightly builds, snapshots, release candidates, or any other
similar package"
> Download HEADER should not have pointer to nightly builds
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1999
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1999
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Environment: http://www.apache.org/dist/lucene/solr/HEADER.html
> Reporter: Sebb
> Assignee: Hoss Man
>
> The file HEADER.html should not have a pointer to nightly builds.
> Nightly builds should be reserved for developers, and not advertised to the
> general public.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]