[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12887813#action_12887813
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-2536:
--------------------------------------
Thanks for the rapid response Mike/Shai.
I'll need to patch a couple of production systems using 2.4.0 and 2.9.1 with
this.
For the record - with this same change applied, the test passes OK on these
older versions too.
> Rollback doesn't preserve integrity of original index
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2536
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2536
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Index
> Affects Versions: 3.0.2
> Environment: Windows XP pro
> Reporter: Mark Harwood
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Attachments: LUCENE-2536.patch, LUCENE-2536.patch, TestRollback.java,
> TestRollback.java
>
>
> After several "updateDocuments" calls a rollback call does not return the
> index to the prior state.
> This seems to occur if the number of updates exceeds the RAM buffer size i.e.
> when some flushing of updates occurs.
> Test fails in Lucene 2.4, 2.9, 3.0.1 and 3.0.2
> JUnit to follow.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]