[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2514:
--------------------------------
Attachment: LUCENE-2514.patch
updated patch:
* dropped the range query/filter changes so we can refactor those separately.
* removed the BytesRef.EMPTY, uwe pointed out this is very dangerous since we
cant prevent someone from modifying it.
* tried to optimize preflex codec, removing more conversions and removing
scratchbytesref copying... i think more can be done here.
* merged in uwe's latest multitermquery changes.
> Change Term to use bytes
> ------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2514
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2514
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Search
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Attachments: LUCENE-2514-MTQPagedBytes.patch,
> LUCENE-2514-MTQPagedBytes.patch, LUCENE-2514-MTQPagedBytes.patch,
> LUCENE-2514-surrogates-dance.patch, LUCENE-2514.patch, LUCENE-2514.patch,
> LUCENE-2514.patch, LUCENE-2514.patch, LUCENE-2514.patch, LUCENE-2514.patch,
> LUCENE-2514.patch, LUCENE-2514.patch
>
>
> in LUCENE-2426, the sort order was changed to codepoint order.
> unfortunately, Term is still using string internally, and more importantly
> its compareTo() uses the wrong order [utf-16].
> So MultiTermQuery, etc (especially its priority queues) are currently wrong.
> By changing Term to use bytes, we can also support terms encoded as bytes
> such as numerics, instead of using
> strange string encodings.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
