On 4/26/10 2:43 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
My best guess: that what this is really suggesting is that "trunk"
*always*  be targeted at the next "major" release (ie: 4.0, 5.0, 6.0,
etc...) and that development of minor releases (ie: 3.2, 3.3, ...; 4.1.,
4.2, etc...) happen on "more stable" branches off of the major version
release branches (ie: branch_3_0 forks off trunk when 3.0 is release,
branch_3_1 forks off branch_3_0 when 3.1 releases, etc...)

This is what I would like. Not sure if that's what will come from the current proposal or not, but seems so to me.

--
- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to