This is a concern: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2036
Gary On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > I have implemented something to help https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/SOLR-7887 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7887> > but I am trying to figure out how to validate it. > > Ralph > > > > > On Oct 29, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Are we ready now? > > > > > > On 2017-10-12 22:02, Ralph Goers wrote: > >> I have a number of issues I have grabbed. I need to look through them > and see what I can do. > >> However, I want to get the Automatic-Module-Name headers in. I’ve done > the work but am waiting to finalize what the names should be based on > Stephen Colbourne’s recommendations. > >> Ralph > >>> On Oct 12, 2017, at 12:36 PM, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Is there any ongoing work that we want to wait for? > >>> > >>> I would like to do these: > >>> > >>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2062 (waiting for > contributor to update his PR, will do it myself soon if he doesn't respond > timey) > >>> > >>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2069 (looks quite > serious if it is valid) > >>> > >>> Anything else? > >>> > >>> > >>> On 2017-10-12 21:12, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > >>>> Some users are eager to get access to some newly added features: > >>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/110 > >>>> When do we plan to do a 2.10.0 release? > >>> > > > > > >
