"Within reason" should be the operative term here... IOW, let's not handcuff ourselves unless necessary.
Gary On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > Since appenders are usually final classes, I think the only compatibility > there is calling compatibility. For managers, users can extend the classes, > so implementation compatibility would make sense. > > On 5 October 2017 at 11:53, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> wrote: > > > We try to keep binary compatibility for appenders and layouts in > > log4j-core. Does that apply to the managers used by appenders as well? > > > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >
