On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 06:16:04PM +0200, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 5:38 PM, Alan Pevec <ape...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > I think having the two separated images is the only way we can ensure we > > are not polluting the image in the initial phase with packages newer that > > in the stabilized repo. > > > > This should be a small list, are any of those actually included in the > > base image? > > > > Yes, the list is small but we can't be sure if it will change at some > point, and analysing if we are having one of those cases on each change is > too error prone, IMO. > > > > Alternatively, which jobs use "normal" f28 images, could we switch > > them to use "stabilized" f28 ? > > > > fedora-stable has the required packages to run and build python3 packages. > Currently it's missing some requirements for the jobs running on fedora 28 > image although it's something we could work on. > > > > > > Alan > > > > Maybe I'm underestimating the cost of maintaining two different images for > fedora, but my understanding is that the resources the extra image uses and > the effort to maintain is workable. Please, correct me if i'm wrong.
I wouldn't say minimal, but there is a cost. With fedora-29 around the corner, it does mean we have 2 iamges to update now, over one. How long does this image need to live for? When can we get to a point of just using the default fedora image? - Paul _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@lists.rdoproject.org http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev To unsubscribe: dev-unsubscr...@lists.rdoproject.org
