Hi, André Schnabel wrote: > Hi, > > > Ivo Hinkelmann - Sun Germany - schrieb: >> >> as there was not much feedback regarding those builds and I made a lot >> of dirty tricks in the localization35 cws I just wanted ask if the >> localization looks fine so far now. >> >> Can you confirm this? > > Yes, the localization integration in m5 and m6 looks good so far. Good job!
+1 :) > > Unfortunately, we had to apply some very late fixes for German > translation - and late fixes are likely to introduce new bugs. > We alredy found a typo in UI and some missing translation updates in > help. None of those is release critical - so no stopper for 3.1. > > But if possible, it would be welcome to have a l10n bugfix cycle for > 3.1.1. We do not need to do this in pootle - I could provide sdf with > the diffs directly (and apply fixes for 3.2 in parallel to pootle). > Is it possible to get these fixes into 3.1.1 - and if yes, what was the > proposed schedule? I have the same request for a typo in function name. So this in not critical but an earlier fix than 3.2 would be very welcome. I can apply the same process that Andre suggested. Kind regards Sophie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
