Thank you, Gang! Looking forward to seeing this feature in Kylin.

2018-04-01 17:35 GMT+08:00 Ma Gang <mg4w...@163.com>:

> Sure ShaoFeng, I add a storageType field in the SnapshotDesc to support
> different materialized storages.
> At 2018-04-01 09:57:23, "ShaoFeng Shi" <shaofeng...@apache.org> wrote:
> >Thank you Ma Gang; This is a good proposal. Externalizing the lookup
> >snapshots will reduce the burden of Kylin query servers.
> >
> >My only comment is, does this implementation support extension? You know
> >since Kylin 1.5, Kylin has the plug-in architecture, HBase is one
> >implementation for the storage. Kylin core modules don't directly depend
> on
> >HBase anymore;  so please take this into consideration when you implement
> >it.
> >
> >2018-03-30 17:57 GMT+08:00 magang <mg4w...@163.com>:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> There are two limitations for current lookup table design:
> >>
> >> 1. lookup table size is limited, because table snapshot need to be
> cached
> >> in
> >> Kylin server, too large snapshot table will break Kylin server, also the
> >> snapshot building may take very long time when it is too large.
> >> 2. each segment has its own lookup table snapshot, but some users may
> need
> >> a
> >> global snapshot table, which means when the global table is updated, the
> >> query for all segments need to reflect the change.
> >>
> >> To resolve the above limitations, I have created ticket:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-3221
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-3221>  , and put initial
> new
> >> design doc there, any comments and suggestions are welcome.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent from: http://apache-kylin.74782.x6.nabble.com/
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Best regards,
> >
> >Shaofeng Shi 史少锋
>



-- 
Best regards,

Shaofeng Shi 史少锋

Reply via email to