Cannot agree more. GUI has many to improve.. On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Alberto Ramón <a.ramonporto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> yes, Nowadays, I'm doing a performance testing creating a lot of cubes, > changing configuration of dimensions to evaluate their impact on building > time and size of cube > > I'm bored of Create Cube Wizard :(, a lot of clicks !! > > Some small changes: > > * Default names of columns. I think this will be a new feature in 1.6.1 ?? > * Add Normal and Derived Dim, can be faster if see all available columns > and tables in the main windows (Similar to add Joint Dim) > * Add Measures UI is very heavy ... Default names? add all measures of the > one column at same time (no measure by measure) > .... Other people will have a lot of better ideas, I'm sure !! > > Did I dream that you will load / save the Create Cube configuration wizard > to a file using UI ? now I can't find JIRA. > Will be great save & load configuration of unfinished cubes > > 2016-12-18 11:43 GMT+01:00 Luke Han <luke...@gmail.com>: > > > There's REST API for cube creation, you could try to write some scripts > to > > bulk load measures. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Best Regards! > > --------------------- > > > > Luke Han > > > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Li Yang <liy...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Btw it is not often that MIN/MAX is as useful as SUM. For the sake of > > build > > > time and storage, you may not want to add MAX/MIN for every measure. > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:44 PM, 汪胜 <sky...@163.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for your suggestion! I'll try this way. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 在2016年12月13日 21:26， Billy Liu<billy...@apache.org>写道： > > > > > > > > Maybe you could edit the cube json directly, but be careful always. > > > > > > > > 2016-12-13 15:30 GMT+08:00 汪胜 <sky...@163.com>: > > > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > I have many measures(about fifty), and I have to create SUM, > MIN > > > and > > > > > MAX for every measure. Is there any good ways to create them at a > > time > > > > > instead of create one by one? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
